|
Post by racaille on Jan 15, 2016 18:29:08 GMT
Thinking of Zara's Tordi ... do they actually know what is wrong?
Sam was lame in the autumn. I was sure he had an abscess (and spent much time chasing around after him wielding nappies!) but the vet was certain it was his dodgy foot playing up. But I couldn't see why that should be the case. Well the farrier shod him ysdty and showed me the abscess hole. Ya boo sucks Mr Vet! I'm starting to feel that vets know a lot less than we hope and their default position is to chuck bute etc at a problem and hope.
(I will get pix of Sam's feet now as they are SOOOOOO much improved - actually rather beautiful!)
There was a very interesting article in the Christmas issue of one of the horsey mags in which Nic of Rockley Farm was interviewed. She made her case very well but said three things were absolutely crucial to being barefoot and one of these was correct biomechanics of the foot. This does explain why Sam was not always sound barefoot.
|
|
|
Post by solomon on Jan 15, 2016 19:01:48 GMT
Nic always wants to see X-rays prior to accepting new rehabs to Rockley Farm. Having said that I have never heard of anyone being turned away. Pete's biomechanics are on the cusp. Very boxy front feet predisposing him to his navicular changes and very pointy narrow back feet which seem to affect the use of his hocks if his toes get too long. Annoyingly j can't post pics at the moment due to laptop out of action but toon some pics today of Petes feet which look awful! The good news is despite weedy frogs and a stretched whites line he is sound and in reasonable work.
|
|
|
Post by brigadier on Jan 17, 2016 1:15:54 GMT
I agree re the vets, but if insured you are in a catch 22 as if you don't get the vet (who chucks but at it) then you are not covered and if you do get the vet in 12 months you are not covered. Crap situation!
|
|